Navigating the Advertising Rule: Key Compliance Points for Investment Advisers
Author: Destiny Aigbe
October 25, 2024
The “Advertising Rule,” encapsulated in Rule 206(4)-1 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, serves as a regulatory cornerstone for investment advisers, guiding the ethical marketing of advisory services. This rule strictly prohibits advisers from publishing or distributing advertisements containing untrue statements or that are otherwise misleading.
Understanding Advertising Under the Advisers Act
The SEC defines “advertising” broadly to include any public or private announcement or communication, whether through written, digital, or audio-visual media, which markets advisory services or offers investment analysis. Advertising encompasses any material containing analyses, reports, charts, or recommendations related to securities that assist investors in making buy or sell decisions.
Key Prohibitions Under the Advertising Rule
Rule 206(4)-1 specifies several areas that are particularly sensitive under the Advertising Rule:
- Testimonials: Use of client testimonials is prohibited.
- Performance Claims: Advisers cannot highlight past profitable recommendations without balanced disclosure of losses or risks.
- Claims of Predictive Formulas: Any claim that a specific formula or chart can reliably indicate market trends or investment timing is prohibited.
- Free Offers: Offering free services, reports, or analysis without transparency regarding terms is prohibited.
In addition to these specific prohibitions, the SEC has issued guidance and interpretations, including through the Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE) and no-action letters, to provide further clarity on acceptable advertising practices.
Common Advertising Rule Violations
The OCIE has identified recurrent violations of the Advertising Rule. Here are some common issues:
- Misleading Performance Results: Advertising performance data that fails to deduct advisory fees or presents hypothetical results without disclosing underlying assumptions can be misleading. Advisers must be transparent about the costs and limitations of performance metrics to provide investors with a fair view of potential results.
- Cherry-Picking Profitable Recommendations: Highlighting only profitable recommendations is a form of “cherry-picking” and is misleading without the inclusion of non-profitable outcomes or additional context. The SEC’s TCW Group and Franklin no-action letters offer guidelines, suggesting that if positive recommendations are shown, an equal number of negative recommendations must also be disclosed.
- One-on-One Presentations: Even in private meetings, advisers must ensure that all presented information, such as performance results, includes necessary disclosures (like advisory fees), or risk misleading the investor.
- Unsubstantiated Claims of Compliance: Advisers sometimes claim compliance with voluntary performance standards without having sufficient evidence to support such claims. Inaccurate claims can mislead investors about the reliability of performance metrics and services.
- Touting Awards or Rankings: The OCIE’s Touting Initiative uncovered that advisers frequently misuse awards and third-party rankings by omitting key details, such as the selection criteria or whether payment was made to obtain the award. Additionally, advisers have sometimes used false information to secure awards, which further misleads prospective clients.
Key Takeaways for Compliance
A robust compliance program is essential to ensure adherence to the Advertising Rule. Here are recommended steps:
- Pre-Approval Processes: Establish a process to review and approve all marketing materials before they are published.
- Clear Disclosures: Include clear disclosures about advisory fees, benchmarks used, and hypothetical performance limitations.
- Documented Compliance Policies: Maintain written policies on permissible advertising practices and ensure all staff members understand them.
- Transparent Award and Ranking Information: Disclose all relevant details about awards or rankings, including the selection criteria and whether the adviser paid for the award.
In summary, understanding and adhering to the Advertising Rule is critical for maintaining trust and integrity in the advisory industry. By adopting robust policies, investment advisers can ensure their advertising practices remain compliant, transparent, and effective.
About the Author
Destiny Aigbe
Managing Partner
Aigbe Law PLLC | Dark Alpha Capital
A Corporate and Securities Law Firm
With a robust foundation in law and finance, Destiny Aigbe has carved a distinguished career, underpinned by his pivotal role in orchestrating and managing complex transactions that have propelled companies to significant growth and market prominence. As a seasoned attorney and strategic advisor, Destiny has been instrumental in facilitating over $75 million in capital raises, demonstrating a keen acumen for securing funding and fostering investor confidence.
Destiny's leadership in the execution of six successful public listings, through meticulously structured reverse mergers and registration statements, showcases his adeptness in navigating the intricacies of the public markets and his capacity to guide companies through transformative growth phases. His involvement in five mergers as an operator further illustrates his versatile skill set, extending beyond legal expertise to include hands-on management and operational strategy, though these ventures did not involve funding.
Destiny's professional journey is marked by a commitment to excellence and a diverse range of experiences, from representing a wide spectrum of clients including public and private companies, and investment firms, to holding significant roles within the US government. His tenure with the US Department of State and the National Institutes of Health highlights his adaptability and his contribution to the advancement of entrepreneurial ventures in sectors like biotechnology and nanotechnology through strategic funding initiatives.
An alumnus of Vanderbilt University Law School, Destiny focused on Finance and Mergers & Acquisitions, further honing his expertise with a certificate in Law and Business. His foundational education in Finance was obtained with honors from the University of Maryland's Robert H. Smith School of Business, which laid the groundwork for his subsequent achievements in investment banking and legal practice.
Residing in the Washington, D.C. area, Destiny Aigbe continues to leverage his extensive experience and insightful leadership to drive innovation, growth, and success for his clients and the ventures he is involved with.
© Aigbe Law, PLLC