Understanding Shell Companies in Reverse Mergers Under New SEC Rules

Author: Destiny Aigbe

May 27, 2024

For the past ten weeks, we've delved into the intricacies of new regulations affecting SPACs and shell companies. This journey naturally leads us to explore what constitutes a "shell company" in the context of reverse mergers and the potential unintended consequences of these new rules.

New SEC Rules Overview

The SEC's Rule 145a impacts all reverse mergers involving a reporting shell company, mandating the filing of a registration statement on Form S-4 or F-4. This rule applies broadly, not just to SPACs but to any shell company engaging in a reverse merger.

Shell Company Definition

Per Securities Act Rules 405 and 144 and Exchange Act Rule 12b-2, a shell company is defined as an entity with no or nominal operations and assets. This includes any issuer not actively conducting substantial business activities, even if it is publicly listed.

Implications of Being a Shell Company

If a company is deemed a shell, it faces several regulatory and operational hurdles post-reverse merger:

1. Registration Requirements: Filing a Form S-4 or F-4 for all reverse merger transactions.

2. Financial Statements: Compliance with the stringent financial statement requirements of Rule 15-01(a).

3. Super 8-K Filing: Filing comprehensive financial information within four days of the merger completion.

4. Ineligible Issuer Status: Restrictions on using certain prospectuses and conducting specific offerings for three years post-merger.

5. Limited Use of Rule 144: Restrictions on the resale of securities until one year after the merger.

6. New Listing Applications: Requiring a new initial listing application under the exchanges' change of control rules, potentially leading to delisting if not pre-approved.

Potential Unintended Consequences: The Seasoning Rule

One significant unintended consequence concerns the seasoning rule. This rule could prevent a reverse merger company deemed a shell from maintaining its listing unless it meets certain criteria:

- One-Year Trading History: The post-merger entity must have traded for at least one year on a recognized market.

- Timely SEC Filings: The company must have timely filed all required SEC reports.

- Annual Report with Full-Year Audit: The company must file at least one annual report with audited financial statements.

-Sustained Share Price: The company must maintain the required share price for a sustained period.

Comparing SPACs and Shell Companies

Interestingly, the seasoning rule explicitly exempts SPACs, highlighting a discrepancy in how different types of shell companies are treated. This exemption ensures that SPACs, despite being shell companies, avoid the stringent one-year trading and financial reporting requirements imposed on other shell companies.

Seeking Clarification

Given these complex implications, it is crucial for the SEC and stock exchanges to provide clear guidance on how these new rules will be applied, particularly regarding the seasoning rule and its potential to impact reverse mergers with shell companies. This clarity will help prevent unintended barriers to market access and ensure that reverse mergers remain a viable option for companies seeking public listings.

In summary, while the new SEC rules aim to increase transparency and regulatory compliance, they also introduce challenges that market participants must navigate carefully. Ongoing dialogue with regulatory bodies will be essential to address these issues and refine the regulatory framework governing reverse mergers and shell companies.

About the Author

Destiny Aigbe

Managing Partner

Aigbe Law PLLC | Dark Alpha Capital

A Corporate and Securities Law Firm

With a robust foundation in law and finance, Destiny Aigbe has carved a distinguished career, underpinned by his pivotal role in orchestrating and managing complex transactions that have propelled companies to significant growth and market prominence. As a seasoned attorney and strategic advisor, Destiny has been instrumental in facilitating over $75 million in capital raises, demonstrating a keen acumen for securing funding and fostering investor confidence.

Destiny's leadership in the execution of six successful public listings, through meticulously structured reverse mergers and registration statements, showcases his adeptness in navigating the intricacies of the public markets and his capacity to guide companies through transformative growth phases. His involvement in five mergers as an operator further illustrates his versatile skill set, extending beyond legal expertise to include hands-on management and operational strategy, though these ventures did not involve funding.

Destiny's professional journey is marked by a commitment to excellence and a diverse range of experiences, from representing a wide spectrum of clients including public and private companies, and investment firms, to holding significant roles within the US government. His tenure with the US Department of State and the National Institutes of Health highlights his adaptability and his contribution to the advancement of entrepreneurial ventures in sectors like biotechnology and nanotechnology through strategic funding initiatives.

An alumnus of Vanderbilt University Law School, Destiny focused on Finance and Mergers & Acquisitions, further honing his expertise with a certificate in Law and Business. His foundational education in Finance was obtained with honors from the University of Maryland's Robert H. Smith School of Business, which laid the groundwork for his subsequent achievements in investment banking and legal practice.

Residing in the Washington, D.C. area, Destiny Aigbe continues to leverage his extensive experience and insightful leadership to drive innovation, growth, and success for his clients and the ventures he is involved with.

© Aigbe Law, PLLC